Content and Thematic Analysis Techniques in Qualitative Research: Purpose, Process and Features
Abstract views: 193
/ 
PDF downloads: 98
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59455/qietp.20Keywords:
Nitel araştırma, nitel veri analizi, içerik analizi, tematik analizAbstract
It has been observed that qualitative research methodologies are increasingly used in educational research. However, many errors can occur in qualitative research at various stages, from planning the study to collecting data, from selecting participants to writing the findings. One of the processes where novice qualitative researchers experience the most problems is data analysis. At this stage, researchers often do not know how to structure and code the data, and they lack confidence in their knowledge and skills regarding the processes of developing categories and themes. Another significant issue for researchers is their inability to understand the purposes and usage of the techniques applied in qualitative data analysis. It is even observed that in some studies, the processes of one analysis technique are replaced with those of another technique with similar characteristics. The continued increase of these problems negatively affects the robustness of qualitative research. The present study has been prepared to contribute to solving these issues observed in the literature. The study explains the characteristics, purposes, differences, and necessary steps of content analysis and thematic analysis approaches, which are frequently used in the analysis of qualitative data. Additionally, the study highlights the principles that should be considered in conducting content and thematic analyses, with the hope of assisting researchers in carrying out a rigorous and robust process.
References
Altheide, D. L. (1987). Ethnographic content analysis. Qualitative Sociology, 10(1), 65-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988269
Ballinger, C., Yardley, L., & Payne, S. (2004). Observation and action research. In D.F. Marks & L. Yardley (Eds), Research methods for clinical and health psychology (pp.102-121). London: Sage.
Bloor, M., & Wood, F. (2006). Keywords in qualitative methods: A vocabulary of research concepts. London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209403
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cavanagh, S. (1997). Content analysis: Concepts, methods and applications. Nurse Researcher, 4, 5-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.4.3.5.s2
DeSantis, L. & Noel Ugarriza, D. (2000). The concept of theme as used in qualitative nursing research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 22, 351-372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01939450022044467
Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.
Elo, S. & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 107-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Flick, U. (2014). Mapping the field. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp.3-18). Los Angeles: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n1
Gbrich, C. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction (2nd ed). London: Sage.
Gibson, W. J. & Brown, A. (2009). Working with qualitative data. Los Angelos: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857029041
Graneheim, U. H. & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
Graneheim, U. H., Lindgren, B.-M., Lundman, B. (2017). Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Education Today, 56, 29-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002
Green, J. & Thorogood, N. (2008). Analysing qualitative data. In Silverman D (Ed.), Qualitative methods for health research (pp.173-200). London: Sage.
Guthrie, J., Yongvanich, K. & Ricceri, F. (2004). Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5, 282-293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930410533704
Horsburgh, D. (2003). Evaluation of qualitative research. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12, 307-312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00683.x
Hsieh, H.F. & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277-1288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
Lindgren, B.-M., Lundman, B. & Graneheim, U. H. (2020). Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 108. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103632 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103632
Loffe, H., &Yardley, L. (2004). Content and thematic analysis. In D.F. Marks & L. Yardley (Eds), Research methods for clinical and health psychology (pp. 56-69). London: Sage.
McCain, G.C. (1988). Content analysis: A method for studying clinical nursing problems. Applied Nursing Research, 1(3), 146-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-1897(88)80029-6
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.
Morse J. M. & Field P. A. (1995). Qualitative research methods for health professionals. Thousands Oaks: Sage.
Özden, M. & Saban, A. (2017). Nitel araştırmalarda paradigma ve teorik temeller. In A. Saban & A. Ersoy (Ed.), Eğitimde nitel araştırma desenleri (pp.1-30). Ankara: Anı.
Özden, M., Uçansoy Baştürk, A. & Demir, M. (2015). Kopya çektim, çünkü…: Bir olgubilim çalışması. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry (TOJQI), 6(4), 57-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17569/tojqi.13311
Polit, D., & Beck, C. (2003). Nursing research: Principles and methods. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Powers, B., Knapp, T. (2006). Dictionary of nursing theory and research. New York: Springer.
Robson, C. (1993). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers,
Rolfe, G. (2006). Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: Quality and the idea of qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53, 304-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03727.x
Ryan, G. & Bernard, H. (2000). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 769-802). London: Sage.
Sandelowski, M. (2010). What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health, 33(1), 77-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20362
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003a). Writing the proposal for a qualitative research methodology project. Qualitative Health Research, 13, 781-820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303013006003
Sandelowski, M., & Leeman, J. (2012). Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qualitative Health Research, 22, 1404-1413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312450368
Sparker, A. (2005). Narrative analysis: Exploring the whats and hows of personal stories. In I. Holloway (Ed.), Qualitative research in health care (pp. 191-208). Berkshire: Open University Press.
Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., OConnor, W. (2003). Analysis: Practices, principles and processes. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social sciences students and researchers (pp.199-218). London: Sage.
Tashakkori, A, & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks: Sage
Tuckett, A. G. (2005). Applying thematic analysis theory to practice: A researcher’s experience. Contemporary Nurse, 19, 75-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.19.1-2.75
Twining, P., Heller, R. S., Nussbaum, M., & Tsai. C.-C. (2017). Some guidance on conducting and reporting qualitative studies. Computers & Education, 106, A1-A9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.002
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas,T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15, 398-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048
Willig, C. (2013). Interpretation and analysis. In U. Flick. (Ed.), The Sage handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 136-149). Los Angeles: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n10
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Qualitative Inquiry in Education: Theory & Practice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
