Exploring Five Modes of Thinking for Qualitative Data Analysis on Ikeda Studies


Abstract views: 24 / PDF downloads: 15

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59455/qietp.30

Keywords:

Daisaku Ikeda, peace dialogues, qualitative data analysis, five modes of thinking

Abstract

Amaç: Bu makale, Freeman'ın (2017) nitel veri analizi için beş düşünme biçimine (yani kategorik, anlatısal, diyalektik, şiirsel ve diyagramatik) genel bir bakış sunar ve her bir biçimin Daisaku Ikeda'nın küresel liderler ve akademisyenlerle yaptığı 42 barış diyaloğunu analiz etmek için nasıl uygulanabileceğine dair somut örnekler sunar. Makale, Ikeda'nın barış diyaloglarını birden fazla düşünme biçimiyle anlamanın neden önemli olduğunu ve Ikeda'nın diyaloglarında barışın hangi bileşen boyutlarının örneklendirildiğini ele almaktadır.

Yöntem: Araştırma nitel bir veri analizi, özellikle bir belge analizi içeriyordu. Bu, Ikeda'nın yayınlanmış diyaloglarını bulmayı ve toplamayı içeriyordu, bunlardan 42'si üç kriteri karşılıyordu (yani, İngilizce dil kullanılabilirliği, barışla ilgili konuları kapsayan diyaloglar ve kaynaklarının doğruluğu). Öz-yansıtıcılık, veri toplama ve analiziyle ilgili kendi sınırlamalarımızı ve inançlarımızı eleştirel bir şekilde incelemek için kullanıldı.

Bulgular : Bulgular, çoklu düşünme biçimlerinin benimsenmesinin, veri analizi sürecinde diyaloglara daha geniş bir bakış açısı sağlama ve ilişkisel ve yaratıcı epistemolojik iç içe geçmeyi teşvik etme açısından avantajlı olduğunu göstermektedir.

Araştırma ve Uygulama İçin Sonuçlar:   Gelecekteki araştırmalar, Ikeda'nın barış ve ötesi üzerine diyaloglarının nicel veri analizinde kullanılan farklı düşünme biçimlerinin daha fazla analiz edilmesi ve karşılaştırılması yoluyla mevcut çalışmanın bulgularına dayanabilir.

References

Alvarez-Hernandez, L.R., & Flint, M. (2023). Epistemological weaving: Writing and sense making in qualitative research with Gloria Anzaldúa. Social Sciences (2076-0760), 12(7), 408. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12070408

Ashworth, R.E., McDermott, A.M., & Currie, G. (2019). Theorizing from qualitative research in public administration: Plurality through a combination of rigor and richness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(2), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy057

Birks, M., Chapman, Y., & Francis, K. (2008). Memoing in qualitative research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 13(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987107081254

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Brinkmann, S. (2014). Doing without data. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 720–725. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414530254

Brown, M.E.L., Kelly, M., & Finn, G.M. (2021). Thoughts that breathe, and words that burn: poetic inquiry within health professions education. Perspectives on Medical Education, 10, 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-021-00682-9

Clandinin, D.J., & Connelly, F.M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.

Dahal, N. (2023). Ensuring quality in qualitative research: A researcher’s reflections. The Qualitative Report, 28(8), 2298–2317. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol28/iss8/5/

Daisaku Ikeda Official Website (2024a). Daisaku Ikeda: A biographical sketch. https://www.daisakuikeda.org/main/profile/bio/bio-01.html

Daisaku Ikeda Official Website (2024b). Buddhist humanism. https://www.daisakuikeda.org/main/philos/buddhist/buddh-05.html#:~:text=The%20phrase%20that%20Ikeda%20often,people’s%20capacity%20for%20positive%20transformation.

de Farias, B.G., Dutra-Thomé, L., Koller, S.H., & de Castro, T.G. (2021). Formulation of themes in qualitative research: Logical procedures and analytical paths. Trends in Psychology, 29(1), 155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-020-00052-0

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.

Fabos, A. H., Kahn, L., & Sarkis, M. (2021). Moving stories: Methodological challenges to mapping narratives and networks of people in diasporas. Journal of Refugee Studies, 34(3), 2554–2567. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feab072

Freeman, M. (2017). Modes of thinking for qualitative data analysis. Routledge.

Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.

Galman, S.C. (2013). The good, the bad, and the data: Shane the loner ethnographer’s basic guide to qualitative data analysis. Routledge.

Gadamer, H.G. (1960/1975). Truth and method. Continuum.

Goulah, J. (2020). Daisaku Ikeda and the Soka movement for global citizenship. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 40(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1725432

Goulah, J. (2021). Value creation and value-creating education in the work of Daisaku Ikeda, Josei Toda, and Tsunesaburo Makiguchi. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-1137.

Green, E., Solomon, M., & Spence, D. (2021). Poem as/and palimpsest: Hermeneutic phenomenology and/as poetic inquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211053094

Ho, D.Y.F. (2000). Dialectical thinking: Neither eastern nor western. American Psychologist, 55(9), 1064–1065. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.9.1064

Ikeda Center (2024). What do we mean by the poetic mind? https://www.ikedacenter.org/resources/what-do-we-mean-poetic-mind

Ikeda, D. (2022). The wisdom of the Lotus Sutra, vol. 4. Middleway Press.

Ko, D., & Bal, A. (2019). Rhizomatic research design in a smooth space of learning: Rupturing, connecting, and generating. Critical Education, 10(17), 1–20.

Kuo, N.C., Kawaguich, T., & Yang, Y.F. (2020). Exploring absolute happiness through experiential education. Journal of Experiential Education, 44(4), 346–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825920975141

Kuo, N.C., & Kubicki, J.M. (2022). Engaging youths in conversations on humanity through Daisaku Ikeda children’s literature. New Review of Children’s Literature and Librarianship, 28(1–2), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614541.2022.2151866

Kuo, N.C., & Ramsey, J. (2021). The design of curriculum in human education through Daisaku Ikeda children’s stories. Curriculum and Teaching, 36(2), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.7459/ct/36.2.05

Kuo, N.C., Wood, A., & Williams, K. (2021). Actualizing hope and joy in K-12 curricula through Daisaku Ikeda’s human education. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 2(1), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v2i1.745

Li, P. & Ross, K. (2021). Validity of transformative experiences: An unfolding. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(3-4), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780042091890

Merriam, S. B. & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.

Preissle, J. (2008). Subjectivity statement. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vol. 2, pp. 844–845). SAGE.

Prior, L. (2003). Using documents in social research. SAGE.

Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative (vol. 3), translated by K. McLaughlin & D. Pellauer, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

Sipe, L.R., & Ghiso, M.P. (2004). Developing conceptual categories in classroom descriptive research: Some problems and possibilities. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35(4), 472–485.

Tallent, D., Shelton, S.A., & McDaniel, S. (2021). “It really was my fault”: Examining white supremacy and internalized racism through detained U.S. Black youths’ narratives and counternarratives. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 36(7), 1319–1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2021.1930250

Williams, S.J.E. (2020). Daisaku Ikeda’s philosophy of value-creating global citizenship education and Africana humanism: Africa as the continent of the 21st century. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 9, 69–79. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1265878

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Kuo, N.-C., & Gilbreath, M. (2024). Exploring Five Modes of Thinking for Qualitative Data Analysis on Ikeda Studies. Qualitative Inquiry in Education: Theory & Practice, 2(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.59455/qietp.30

Issue

Section

Research Article