School Administrators' Views on the Curricula in the Context of Effective School Management and Instructional Leadership
Abstract views: 10
/ 
PDF downloads: 1
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59455/qietp.40Keywords:
school administrators, curricula, effective school management, instructional leadershipAbstract
Purpose: This study aimed to examine the school administrators' views on the curricula in the context of effective school management and instructional leadership.
Method: This study employed a qualitative approach to examine the school administrators' views on the curricula in the context of effective school management and instructional leadership. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with sixteen school administrators from two provinces, Çanakkale and Muğla, located in west of Türkiye. Participants were selected by using convenience sampling.
Findings: In this study, school administrators stated that the curricula should be student-centered, skill-oriented, up-to-date, and functional; they also emphasized that it should not be frequently revised and should avoid reliance on rote learning. The current curricula implemented in Türkiye was described as intensive, centralized, disregarding individual differences, and lacking real-life relevance. Additionally, administrators highlighted that having knowledge of the curricula contributes to the effective operation of schools, supports teachers, and serves as a key factor in improving the quality of education.
Implications: This study has revealed that there some points that need improvement in school administrators' curricula knowledge. In-service training programs are recommended to address this development. Familiarity with all curricula will contribute to their effectiveness as school leaders and enhance their instructional leadership skills, thereby improving the quality of education. Additionally, considering the views of school administrators during curricula development processes will contribute to shaping the education system more effectively.
References
Abdullahi, N. J. K. (2020). Ethical Leadership and staff innovative behaviour in Nigeria. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 39(1), 1–19.
Álvarez Contreras, D. E., Montes Padilla, J. D., & Osorio Martínez, C. D. (2023). Management skills as a factor of business competitiveness. Region Cientifica, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.58763/rc2023109
Aslan, S., & Gürlen, E. (2019). Ortaokul öğretmenlerinin program okuryazarlık düzeyleri [Middle school teachers' program literacy levels]. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty], 20(1), 171-186. https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.2018.20.01.006
Atlı, K., Kara, Ö., & Mirzeoğlu, A. D. (2021). Investigating physical education teachers perceptions about their curriculum literacy levels according to some variables. Gazi Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, 26(2), 281-299. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gbesbd/issue/61222/837824
Aydın, M. (2018). Effective school management. Gazi Publishing.
Aygün, E., & Taşdan, M. (2023). Investigation of school administrators’ curriculum literacy status. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 25(2), 369-381. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.1227168
Bakioğlu, A., & Elverici, S. (2020). Finlandiya eğitim sistemi [The Finnish education system]. In A. Bakioğlu (Ed.), Karşılaştırmalı eğitim yönetimi [Comparative educational administration] (pp. 89–125). Nobel Publication.
Bakioğlu, A., & Ülker, N. (2020). İngiltere eğitim sistemi [The British education system]. In A. Bakioğlu (Ed.), Karşılaştırmalı eğitim yönetimi [Comparative educational administration] (pp. 245–288). Nobel Publication.
Balcı, A. (2017). Effective school and school development: Theory, practice, and research. Pegem Academy Publishing.
Bellibas, M. S., Polatcan, M., & Kılınc, A. Ç. (2020). Linking instructional leadership to teacher practices: The mediating effect of shared practice and agency in learning effectiveness. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 50(5), 812–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220945706
Bolat, Y. (2017). Concept of curriculum literacy and curriculum literacy scale. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 12(18), 121-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.12103
Can, N. (2007). Primary education school administrators’ proficiency level as instructional leaders in developing and applying new curricula. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 3(2), 228-244.
Creswell, J. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
Çetinkaya, S., & Tabak, S. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının eğitim programı okuryazarlık yeterlilikleri [Curriculum literacy efficiency of preservice teachers]. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [OMU Journal of Education Faculty], 38(1), 296-309. https://doi.org/10.7822/omuefd.535482
Demir, E., & Toraman, Ç. (2021). Teachers ' levels of curriculum literacy. Trakya Journal of Education, 11(3), 1516-1528. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.858813
Eren, E. (2000). Organizational behavior and management psychology. Beta Publishing.
Eren, A. (2020). The relationship between instructional leadership behaviors of primary school principals and effective school (Unpublished masters thesis). Gazi University, Ankara.
Dede, C., Richards, J., & Saxberg, B. (2018). Learning engineering for online education: Theoretical contexts and design-based examples (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351186193
Deniz, Ö., Deniz, İ., Deniz, M. Z., Dağ, S., & Şık, Y. (2022). Effective school and elements that play a role in effective school management. The Journal of Academic Social Sciences, 10(133), 332-353.
Daleware Administrative Code (1998). Retrieved from: https://regulations.delaware.gov/AdminCode/title14/1500/1590.shtml.
Durak, D., & Semerci, N. (2016). Problems encountered during the implementation of curricula and school administrators’ opinions as to how to solve them. Turkish Studies, 11(9), 279-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.9547
Giorgi, A. (2009). The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach. Duquesne University Press.
Girgin, A., & Tofur, S. (2023). Instructional leadership of school administrators and teachers' instructional mood states [Paper presentation]. EJER Congress 2023 International Eurasian Educational Research Congress Conference Proceedings, Ankara.
Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221–239). https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760500244793
Hallinger P., & Heck R. H. (2011). Exploring the journey of school improvement: Classifying and analyzing patterns of change in school improvement processes and learning outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(1), 1–27.
He, P., Guo, F., & Abazie, G. A. (2024). School principals’ instructional leadership as a predictor of teacher’s professional development. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(63). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00290-0
İleritürk, D. (2024). Foreign language curriculum literacy: Analysis of the views of teacher candidates in terms of the needs of teachers. Journal of Family, Counseling and Education, 9(2), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.32568/jfce.1468227
İra, N., & Aygün, G. G. (2023). Etkili okul yönetimi [Effective school management]. In Y. Yavuz (Ed.) Etkili okul yönetimi: Örgütsel yapı, okul yönetimi, etkin katılım [Effective school management: Organizational structure, school administration, active participation] (pp.127-162). Efe Akademi Publications.
Judijanto, L., Savitri, A. N., & Purba, D. C. S. (2024). Teachers, curriculum and problems: a critical reflection on education. Journal Ilmiah Edukatif, 10(2), 190-200. https://doi.org/10.37567/jie.v10i2.3307
Kalkan Çelik, C., & Sezgin, F. (2022). The relationships between learning-centered leadership and curriculum literacy of school administrators. GEFAD, 42(3), 2757-2791. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.1195952.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1977). The social psychology of organizations. TODAİE Publishing.
Keskinkılıç Yumuşak, G. (2022). National science curriculum documents in Türkiye and the United States: Comparison in terms of scope and detail. Participatory Educational Research, 9(5), 373-389. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.119.9.5
Kilag O. K. T., & Sasan, J. M. (2023). Unpacking the role of instructional leadership in teacher professional development. Advanced Qualitative Research, 1(1), 63-73. https://doi.org/10.31098/aqr.v1i1.1380
Korkmaz, İ. (2020). Population, sample, sampling techniques in qualitative research. B. Oral and A. Çoban (Eds.), In Scientific research methods in education from theory to practice (pp. 147-159). Pegem Akademi Publishing.
Lee, J. C. K., & Dimmock, C. (1999). Curriculum leadership and management in secondary schools: A Hong Kong Case study. School Leadership & Management, 19, 455-481.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13632439968970
López‐Fernández, M., & Romero Fernández, P. M. (2024). Competencies and managerial skills. IGI Global.
Marek, M., Lizerrega-Duenas, L., Woulfin, S., & Wetzel, M. M. (2024). A Framework for curriculum literacy in ınitial teacher preparation: Policy, practices, and possibilities. Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871241263803
Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
Mücevher, M., & Erdem, R. (2019). Successful manager and management: A conceptual framework. Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences, 34, 48-77.
Ornstein, A. (2007). Class counts: Education, inequality, and the shrinking middle class. Rowman & Littlefield. https://l24.im/ZP3c
Owens, R. G., & Valensky, T. C. (2021). Organizational behavior in education: Leadership and school reform. Pegem Akademi Publishing.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2008). Improving school leadership: Rationale and plans for the activity. Meeting of National Representatives, Paris.
Özaydınlı, B. (2023). Curriculum development in Türkiye from the perspective of curriculum specialists. Education and Science, 48(214). https://10.15390/EB.2023.11186
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage.
Paulsrud, D., & Wermke, W. (2019). Decision-making in context: Swedish and Finnish teachers’ perceptions of autonomy. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 4(8). https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1596975.
Sanchez, J., & Watson, J. M. (2021). Effective instructional leadership practices in high performing elementary schools. Journal of School Administration Research and Development, 6(2), 60-70.
Sasan, J. M. V. (2021). The social contract theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke: Comparative analysis. Shanlax International Journal of Art, Science, and Humanities, 9(1), 34-45. https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v9i1.4042
Sebastian, J., Allensworth, E., & Huang, H. (2016). The role of teacher leadership in how principals influence classroom instruction and student learning. American Journal of Education, 123(1), 69–108.
Smith, W. F., & Andrews, R. L. (1989). Instructional leadership: How principal make difference. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Steven L. Miller. (2023). Teaching a standards-based curriculum: The school administrator perspective. Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5704-0_7
Thakur, V. (2024). Management in healthcare: strategies for success. Futuristic Trends in Pharmacy & Nursing, 3(18), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.58532/v3bipn18p2ch1
van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. State University of New York Press
Walker, D. (2003). Fundamentals of curriculum: Passion and professionalism. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Wermke, W., Freier, R., & Nordholm, D. (2023). Framing curriculum making: Bureaucracy and couplings in school administration. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 55(5), 562–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2251543
Wright, R., & Renihan, P. (2008). Saskatchewan principal study report five: A review of the literature. SSTA Research Centre Report.
Yeşilyurt, E. (2019). An evaluation of curriculum leadership of school administrators in the context of updated curriculums. Journal of International Social Research, 12(62). 1119-1142. https://dx.doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2019.3124
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences]. Seçkin Publishing.
Yusof, R. B. (2019). Application of decomposed theory of planned behavior on intention to save in voluntary private retirement fund in Malaysia (Unpublished doctoral thesis), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.
Yüksel, S. (2003). Curriculum development studies and problems in Turkey. Journal of National Education, 159. http://dhgm.meb.gov.tr/yayimlar/dergiler/Milli_Egitim_Dergisi/159/syuksel.htm
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Qualitative Inquiry in Education: Theory & Practice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
